Posts Tagged ‘Congress’

No More Obama Mania for Me

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

I have unsubscribed from President Obama’s “Organizing for America” email list.  When asked the reason, I stated “I’m tired of all the hype.”  For me, the last straw was his health care speech last night, which I turned off after the first two paragraphs.

And what did these paragraphs consist of?  Health Care Insurance Horror Stories.  Well, there are also Health Care Horror Stories, Hospital Horror Stories and the like.  I don’t need to hear anecdotes.
Obama wants to ram the whole thing through. He told Congress last night that he was not the first president to try to reform health care, but he is determined to be the last.  I think he should start at the bottom and work up.

We elected a president, not a king.  Just because Obama says or thinks something is true doesn’t automatically make it so.  Unfortunately, the Republicans are good at heckling and not much else.  Hopefully, “centrists” like Joe Lieberman (my favorite) can slow down the “Obama Express”, which is beginning to look more and more like a train wreck.

Charles Krauthammer’s Twisted Logic (My Comment on his March 6th column)

Friday, March 6th, 2009

Charles Krauthammer, in his column, “The Great Non Sequitur, The Sleight of Hand Behind Obama’s Agenda” in the March 6th Washington Post, has twisted the logic in President Obama’s recent address to Congress. Obama is saying that changes in healthcare education and energy will help grow the economy, that they have been put off for too long in favor of short term goals. (Although dependence on foreign oil did have something to do with the current crisis.)

Obama’s argument.

PREMISE: Reforms in healthcare, energy and education were deferred in the past in favor of short term gains.

PREMISE: Search for short term financial gains without adequate regulation, and the lack of fiscal responsibility, got us into the current crisis.

PREMISE: Reforms in healthcare, energy and education will help grow the economy.

CONCLUSION: Therefore: In addition to reviving the economy, we must push for reforms in healthcare, energy and education to help insure our long term prosperity.

Not a non sequitur, Dr. Krauthammer.

Krauthammer’s version:

The logic of Obama’s address to Congress went like this:

“Our economy did not fall into decline overnight,” he averred. Indeed, it all began before the housing crisis. What did we do wrong? We are paying for past sins in three principal areas: energy, health care and education — importing too much oil and not finding new sources of energy (as in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the Outer Continental Shelf?), not reforming health care, and tolerating too many bad schools.

The “day of reckoning” has arrived. And because “it is only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we’ll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament,” Obama has come to redeem us with his far-seeing program of universal, heavily nationalized health care; a cap-and-trade tax on energy; and a major federalization of education with universal access to college as the goal.

Amazing. As an explanation of our current economic difficulties, this is total fantasy. As a cure for rapidly growing joblessness, a massive destruction of wealth, a deepening worldwide recession, this is perhaps the greatest non sequitur ever foisted upon the American people.

Obama in his speech:

The fact is, our economy did not fall into decline overnight. Nor did all of our problems begin when the housing market collapsed or the stock market sank. We have known for decades that our survival depends on finding new sources of energy. Yet we import more oil today than ever before. The cost of health care eats up more and more of our savings each year, yet we keep delaying reform. Our children will compete for jobs in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare them for. And though all these challenges went unsolved, we still managed to spend more money and pile up more debt, both as individuals and through our government, than ever before.

In other words, we have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day.

Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here.

Now is the time to act boldly and wisely – to not only revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard choices to bring our deficit down.

I rest my case

That Cartoon. An Update

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

Here is the statement from Rupert Murdoch in Tuesday’s New York Post about “that cartoon”.

“As the Chairman of the New York Post, I am ultimately responsible for what is printed in its pages. The buck stops with me.
Last week, we made a mistake. We ran a cartoon that offended many people. Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended, and even insulted.
Over the past couple of days, I have spoken to a number of people and I now better understand the hurt this cartoon has caused. At the same time, I have had conversations with Post editors about the situation and I can assure you – without a doubt – that the only intent of that cartoon was to mock a badly written piece of legislation. It was not meant to be racist, but unfortunately, it was interpreted by many as such.
We all hold the readers of the New York Post in high regard and I promise you that we will seek to be more attuned to the sensitivities of our community.”

I believe him. After all, the main author of the Stimulus package was Nancy Pelosi, so the chimp, in the cartoonist’s mind, was akin to one of those monkeys I referred to in my earlier post. It was too “overtly racist”, if you will, to refer to Obama. However, the key phrase in Murdoch’s statement is “sensitivities”. Old racist stereotypes die hard, and they are still alive in many people’s minds.

That New York Post Cartoon

Friday, February 20th, 2009

First, the cartoon, by Sean Delonas.

Cartoon by Sean Delonas

Second, the response by the Post to the criticism it received.

THAT CARTOON

Wednesday’s Page Six cartoon – caricaturing Monday’s police shooting of a chimpanzee in Connecticut – has created considerable controversy.
It shows two police officers standing over the chimp’s body: “They’ll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill,” one officer says.
It was meant to mock an ineptly written federal stimulus bill.
Period.
But it has been taken as something else – as a depiction of President Obama, as a thinly veiled expression of racism.
This most certainly was not its intent; to those who were offended by the image, we apologize.
However, there are some in the media and in public life who have had differences with The Post in the past – and they see the incident as an opportunity for payback.
To them, no apology is due.
Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon – even as the opportunists seek to make it something else.

Third, my attempt to logically analyze this.

I should point out the difficulties in trying apply logic to what is written in newspapers, let alone newspaper cartoons, but here goes.

The Post said that the cartoon was meant to mock an ineptly written federal stimulus bill.
Surely the caption gave the strong impression that the dead chimpanzee represented in some way the writer(s) of said bill. Now there’s that old joke about if you had enough monkeys on typewriters, one would do Hamlet. By the same token, one would do the stimulus bill. Is that where the cartoonist was going? One dead chimp to a lot of (dead) monkeys?

Then there’s the Post’s disclaimer that their apology doesn’t apply to opportunists looking for payback. So their apology only applies to people who were genuinely offended, as opposed to those who are always looking for ways to be offended by the Post.

But let’s ask ourselves, who in fact wrote the Stimulus Bill. Evidently it was written by Congressional Democrats and their staffers (the monkeys?), with guidance from the White House. However, at the end of the day, if one name has to be attached to the bill, it is that of our president, Barack Obama, who just happens to be an African-American.

Enter stage right the longtime racist identification of black people with apes of various kinds. So was the chimpanzee, and a dead one at that, meant to represent our president? If so, we should bring on the Patriot Act.

End of my analysis. To paraphrase Fox News, I pontificate, you decide.

PS. I’m sure you’re dieing to know where I come down on this. I think that, subconsciously, the cartoonist associated Obama with an ape, though not a dead one. Such associations should really be banished, even from humor. They just aren’t funny, not to mention disrespectful. The New York Post has plenty of other ways to spread its venom.

Stimulation (as in stimulating the economy)

Sunday, February 8th, 2009

The title refers to the stimulus package now before Congress. To be sung to the music of “Celebration”, by Kool and the Gang. Karaoke style.

Stimulation