Posts Tagged ‘George W Bush’

Joe Wilson’s “You Lie!”

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

At the heart of Rep. Wilson’s outburst is racism, pure and simple.  When he, and some others, look at Obama, they see a black man, not POTUS.  Barack Obama has always acted in a very dignified  manner.  He is not confrontational  as was, say, FDR.  He deserves our respect and civility.  The attempts to de-legitimize his presidency are based on racism, by people who in days of yore would have wanted to tar and feather him.

One benefit of the fallout from Wilson’s attack is that, in people’s reactions, we get to see who the real racists are, like Rush Limbaugh.  (As if we didn’t already know!)  This is a very ugly situation we are in.  The Republicans would do well to stay clear of this, especially from what have become racist code words.  This is not the return of Lee Atwater.  Willie Horton was not a stand-in for Michael Dukakis.  This is not Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”.  This is personal.

George W. Bush was a stalwart supporter of civil rights,  and he practiced what he preached.  Republicans would do well to follow his good example instead of repudiating it.

Did George W. Bush Suspend the “Laws of Arithmetic”?

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

“It’s a Time to Listen, and to Obey the Laws of Arithmetic” is the title of an article in the November 9th, 2008, New York Times by Harvard Professor Gregory Mankiw, who was chairman of President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers from 2003 to 2005. The article is incredibly patronizing and condescending. Here is the letter I sent to the Times.

I think it was very thoughtful of Gregory Mankiw, Harvard Professor and former Bush economic adviser, to give his patronizing little lecture to President-Elect Obama about how he should listen to his economic advisors, stating that “[t]hey will often give advice quite different from what will be coming from the Congressional leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. To make sure the views of economic advisers are heard, they should have offices close to the Oval Office. The chief of staff should invite them to all the relevant meetings.”

Professor Mankiw’s column leads me to ask: Where was he while George W. Bush was busy bankrupting the country? Did he give Bush any lectures about obeying the “laws of arithmetic,” or were these laws suspended after 9/11, along with parts of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?

Talk about being an elitist! Some say Obama is one, but Mankiw certainly wasn’t talking to him “elitist to elitist” I especially liked the part about the proximity of the economic advisers’ offices to the Oval Office. Vice President Cheney’s office isn’t even in the White House, and the adviser Bush says he listens to the most is located somewhere in Heaven.

Slime Time Live in Newsweek

Sunday, April 8th, 2007

I sent this letter to Newsweek in 2004. It was published with some deletions.
**************
Trying to balance the “Swift Boat” attacks on Kerry with the “National Guard” attacks on Bush does not make for balanced news. One involves tearing down behavior in battle that was deemed worthy of several Purple Hearts. The other involves filling in gaps in a service record embarked on (with whose help?) to avoid battle, and notable more for absence from, rather than attendance to, duty. Trying to equate these in any substantive way is not balance, it is spin. With bogus equivalences like this, who needs Rupert Murdoch?

On Paying For The War in Iraq (April, 2007)

Wednesday, April 4th, 2007

Here is a letter I sent to the Detroit Free Press

To the Editor:
On the Iraq war, Bush is delusional and Congressional Democrats
are behaving badly. The president now labels the judgment of
critics with children in the military as “emotional”. Congress
passes an emergency appropriations bill with pork and timelines.
Why don’t they attach instead a provision calling for a war tax
surcharge. This will keep the country from going bankrupt with
unfunded programs and tax cuts for the rich. These cuts have
stimulated the economy but have not generated sufficient
increased revenue to pay for themselves. The President says
that the American people should go shopping, and that they
sacrifice for the war by watching the blood and gore on TV.

I think something more substantial is called for. A tax
surcharge is fiscally responsible. It pays for huge debts
that exist now and will continue into the future. If General
Petraeus can’t get the surge to work, the President will
have to face reality and change our role there. So let the
war go on for a few more months without Congressional
strings attached, but with the proviso that we pay for it
as we go. Otherwise we will not be able to inflate our way
out of future deficits, and they will surely drown us.
The buck should not be passed on to future generations.
The buck stops in the here and now.