Posts Tagged ‘NY Times’

Limericks

Sunday, October 4th, 2009

What follows are my entries to Ben Schott’s Limerick contest in this weekend’s NY Times. He gives bonus marks for those using any of the following words:

Birthers · Darwin · Surge · Olympian · Swine Flu · Clunker · Gubernatorial · Stimulus · iPhone · Madoff · Google · Blackmail · Uranium · Irony · People’s Republic of China · Extradition · Congress · Wikipedia · Euthanasia

My entries:

The Birthers would have us believe
Obama, when he was conceived
His mom was in Kenya
With such an agenda
She took more than nine months to leave

The People’s Republic of China
Why can’t it be gentl-ah and kind-ah?
Chairman Mao was a brute
He gave not a hoot
How many were sent to the grind-ah

Schott’s Vocab Is Splendid Because
He wants us to make no faux paux
“Use ‘Darwin’ and ’surge’
But don’t get the urge
To send me an x-rated clause”

What a con man was Bernie Madoff
As with people’s money he made off
Now he sits in a cell
And if he behaves well
He will still not get any time off

As Polanski fights extradition
He appears to show no contrition
He’s a dirty old man
Who’s been on the lam
Who decent would back his position?

An attempt to blackmail Dave Letterman
Was made by a man named Joe Halderman
Joe needed the money
Knew one of Dave’s “honeys”
So which of the two is the better man?

Obama as Icarus

To help make his hometown Oh-lym-pian
Obama did fly to Co-pin-hagin
He flew too near the sun
‘Twas Rio who won
Now he’s lost his wings, too bad for him!

David Brooks Warns that We’re Up the Creek

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

In today’s NY Times column, “A Moderate Manifesto,” David Brooks “sounds the alarm” over the proposed Obama budget. He quotes a column in a similar vein by Clive Crook of the Financial Times, “The Budget Reveals the Liberal Obama”, in which Crook says,

“The draft contains no trace of compromise. It makes no gesture, however small, however costless to its larger agenda, of a bipartisan approach to the great questions it addresses. It is a liberal’s dream of a new New Deal.”

Here is the comment I posted.

“David Brooks, in this column, is giving fodder to the hard right. He is always thoughtful, but now he sounds naive.
“Barack Obama is not who we thought he was.”
Limbaugh will have a field day with that one. (BTW, RNC Chair Michael Steele just apologized to El Rushbo.)
It is worth noting that part of the tax code has always been for income redistribution. It is as American as Teddy Bears. (as in Teddy Roosevelt)
Obama presented his budget, so now “moderates” like Brooks should try to change what they perceive as its excesses. A good place to start would be with House Democrats. This administration believes in the democratic process, as opposed to the last one. So my advice to Brooks is to write (or e-mail) his congressman!”

Such gnashing of teeth! Doesn’t it break your heart? Crook even apologized to Republicans.
Brooks, Crook. Schnooks. Let the income redistribution begin!

Tom Friedman Should Hang Out (Up?) in His Closet for A Few Days

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

 

 

“Radical in the White House” is the title of an over-the-top column

 

 by Thomas Friedman in today’s New York Times. Early-on he states:

“Indeed, dare I say, I hope Obama really has been palling around all these years with that old Chicago radical Bill Ayers. I hope Obama really is a closet radical.

Not radical left or right, just a radical, because this is a radical moment.”

Friedman is confusing “radical”, the adjective, with “radical”, the noun. Here is the comment I posted.

You hope that Obama has been palling around with Bill Ayres? All radicals are not alike. Your “gee-whiz” attitude has become “cheese-whiz”. In any case, what you want President Obama to try to accomplish is fully within the law, not outside the law, as Ayres once operated. Overturning the status-quo is a far cry from overthrowing the government. The term “Radical President” is better applied to the new ex-President, George W. Bush.

Your hope that Obama is a “closet radical” demeans him. He has been very forthright about what he wants to accomplish. I think you should go to your own closet and hang out (up?) for a few days until you simmer down.  

column

A Worm for the Big Apple?

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

 “When the Action Moves On” is the title of a rather silly article  in today’s NY Times.  

It starts out with:

“This week, the eyes of the world will be on Washington as perhaps two million people descend to bask in the Obama glow. City officials expect more than 10,000 tour buses to roll into the area. Hotels 150 miles away have been booked for months. Even campsites are booked.”

 Later it states

“Even Portland, Ore., seems to have borrowed New York’s smugness. Recently, one civic group’s television spot was picked up and circulated as a YouTube video portraying blissful bicyclists pedaling past tree-lined streets and frame houses behind a graphic reading, ‘Is Portland the most European city, or is Europe the most Portlandian continent?’

Isn’t that supposed to be New York’s line?”

It also puts in a dig at Detroit.

The article details some of the city’s losses during the recent economic downturn, as if this hasn’t been happening in cities all across the country.

Here is the letter I sent. (They never publish my letters. I guess they don’t publish humorous letters, or maybe they do but they just don’t think mine are funny.)

Whadda you mean, “New York is losing its swagger and sense of pre-eminence”? Hasn’t Washington, D.C. been the capital for quite some time? Since when has New York been considered a European city? New York has always been New York. Washington, on the other hand, was built on a swamp, to look like Paris. Well, it is certainly no Paris, though it still may be a swamp.

As for the inauguration, look how it is paralyzing the D.C. area. For New Yorkers, it would be a mere walk in (maybe Central) Park. So get over it! I’m sure that, before long, the Obama’s will be spending weekends in New York.